Feature Request: Optional “Reset My Limits” / Limit Warm-Up Trigger #709
Closed
mahirozdin
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
@Soju06 I forked and created a PR for this feature but because I forget to open contributions @Komzpa had to create a repair fix branch becase was not able to push my branch. But my feature #773 is merged and released ont he latest version but I'm not on the contributors list because It wasnt my branch because of this situation. Could you please add me as a contributor to repo. Thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
I have been using Codex LB for a while with multiple Codex accounts and several proxied devices. Overall, it works very well for balancing usage across accounts, but I noticed a small missing feature that could improve practical limit utilization.
The feature could be called something like:
Reset My Limits
or
Limit Warm-Up Trigger
or
Auto Start Limit Window
The main idea is this:
From my observation, when a Codex usage limit is refreshed, the new limit window does not necessarily start immediately at the exact reset time. Instead, the effective usage window seems to start when the first request is made after the reset.
This can cause some wasted time between:
For example, if a weekly limit becomes available but the account stays idle for several hours before the first real request, that idle time is effectively lost from the usable cycle. The same logic also applies to shorter rolling windows, such as 5-hour limits.
A possible solution would be to add an optional feature in Codex LB that automatically sends a very small request using the cheapest available model as soon as a limit refresh is detected or expected.
For example:
A simple example:
Without this feature:
With this feature:
This could allow users to consume the remaining available limit more efficiently and reach the next reset sooner, instead of losing idle time after the limit becomes available.
Of course, this should be optional and configurable because not every user may want automatic traffic to be sent on their behalf.
Possible configuration options:
The request itself could be extremely simple, for example:
or
The purpose is not to consume meaningful tokens, but only to trigger the next limit cycle as early as possible after a reset.
I think this would be useful especially for users who manage multiple Codex accounts through Codex LB and want more predictable, efficient rotation behavior across accounts.
Thanks for considering it.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions