Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
I've added Async IVerb interfaces in this commit. We wont be adding content type suffix interfaces which would cause an explosion of interfaces, but if there are Content-Types you use frequently you can add and use your own local Content-Type Verb interfaces for the same effect. This change is available from v6.11.1+ that's now available in Pre-Release Packages. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
Now available in the latest v6.11.1+ pre-release packages. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
ServiceStack's
IService
interface already has methods for verbs such asIGet<T>
,IPost<T>
,IPut<T>
, etc. Could you add*Async
suffix interface methods for these verbs as well as interface methods for specifying Content-Types to increase productivity?Examples:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions