Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change default pole_method when source grid does bounds do not include the pole #378

Open
stephenworsley opened this issue Jul 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
New: Feature Highlight a new community raised "feature request" issue

Comments

@stephenworsley
Copy link
Contributor

✨ Feature Request

When the source grid covers a limited band of latitudes, and especially when both bounds are the same side of the equator, it's likely to be inappropriate to extrapolate values that lie outside the source domain. The default behaviour for bilinear and nearest neighbour regridding is to use the esmpy ploe_method ALLAVG, however in such cases a it would be more appropriate to use the method NONE.

@stephenworsley stephenworsley added the New: Feature Highlight a new community raised "feature request" issue label Jul 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@SciTools/esmf-regrid-devs This issue is stale due to a lack of activity in the last 180 days. Remove stale label or comment, otherwise this issue will close automatically in 14 days time.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale: Closure warning This stale issue or pull-request has been marked for closure label Dec 30, 2024
@jrackham-mo
Copy link

Still interested in this feature, any update on its status? Is it superceded by #375?

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale: Closure warning This stale issue or pull-request has been marked for closure label Jan 7, 2025
@stephenworsley
Copy link
Contributor Author

stephenworsley commented Jan 8, 2025

Solving #375 would allow you to resolve this issue yourself by passing the appropriate arguments. This would be done by PR: #396. I don't believe this would change the defaults yet, but it does provide the ability to pass arguments yourself. I think the decision to change the defaults is somewhat separate so this issue is worth keeping around, but do let me know if you feel the work in #396 would be sufficient for your purposes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
New: Feature Highlight a new community raised "feature request" issue
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants