You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
this two algorithms would highly improve the hex meshing capabilities of salome.
the jaal algorithm, it is a unstructured quad mesh generator
advantages over current 2D quad meshing algorithms: it can respect the 1D discretization in contrast to gmsh quasi-structured quad, which can easily break the conformity of a mesh, this algorithm enables the possibility to mesh into a relative good quality quads without this detrimental and therefore make it more compatible with more complex meshes such as meshing a compound geometry with different algorithms where, gmsh quasi-struc quad would fail. (in contrast with the current quad meshers of salome that respect the 1D discretization, gmsh-blossom and netgen quad which generates quite bad quad quality).
the one-to-one sweep, it is an extension of the extrude 3D meshing algorithm.
advantages over curred 3D algorithm: it can increase the possibilities of use cases for more complex geometries where the extrude 3D would not be compatible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I created a feature request for the addition of this two meshing algorithms:
2D paving: jaal algorithm https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-24734-7_28
3D one-to-one sweep https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-02335-9_1
the two algorithms are already implemented in MeshKit under a LGPL-compatible license.
this two algorithms would highly improve the hex meshing capabilities of salome.
the jaal algorithm, it is a unstructured quad mesh generator
advantages over current 2D quad meshing algorithms: it can respect the 1D discretization in contrast to gmsh quasi-structured quad, which can easily break the conformity of a mesh, this algorithm enables the possibility to mesh into a relative good quality quads without this detrimental and therefore make it more compatible with more complex meshes such as meshing a compound geometry with different algorithms where, gmsh quasi-struc quad would fail. (in contrast with the current quad meshers of salome that respect the 1D discretization, gmsh-blossom and netgen quad which generates quite bad quad quality).
the one-to-one sweep, it is an extension of the extrude 3D meshing algorithm.
advantages over curred 3D algorithm: it can increase the possibilities of use cases for more complex geometries where the extrude 3D would not be compatible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: