Correct misunderstanding about bit direction for extra sizes (#89)

In a previous pull request #84 I added several sizes, but mistook the
direction of the binary representation of the added values. Along with
that one of the sizes was calculated incorrectly. (My apologies!)

This corrects both of those errors, successfully tested using the
downstream library. Also I checked (via script) all of the other binary
representations and and they all match the assigned values.

Co-authored-by: jmwample <[email protected]>

Author: jmwample

src/sizes.rs

@@ -819,15 +819,15 @@ mod extra_sizes {
     pub type U49856 = uint!(0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1);
 
     // Kemeleon ML-KEM Encoding sizes
-    pub type U749 = uint!(0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1);
-    pub type U781 = uint!(0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1);
-    pub type U877 = uint!(0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1);
-    pub type U1124 = uint!(0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0);
-    pub type U1156 = uint!(0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0);
-    pub type U1252 = uint!(0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0);
-    pub type U1498 = uint!(0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0);
-    pub type U1530 = uint!(0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0);
-    pub type U1626 = uint!(0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0);
+    pub type U749 = uint!(1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1);
+    pub type U781 = uint!(1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1);
+    pub type U877 = uint!(1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1);
+    pub type U1124 = uint!(0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1);
+    pub type U1156 = uint!(0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1);
+    pub type U1252 = uint!(0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1);
+    pub type U1498 = uint!(0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1);
+    pub type U1530 = uint!(0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1);
+    pub type U1658 = uint!(0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1);
 
     impl_array_sizes! {
         1040 => U1040,
@@ -1049,6 +1049,6 @@ mod extra_sizes {
         1252 => U1252,
         1498 => U1498,
         1530 => U1530,
-        1626 => U1626,
+        1658 => U1658,
     }
 }