You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm wondering about the similarities/differences and pros/cons of using pcangsd --admix vs. fastmixture for assignment/admixture/STRUCTURE analyses on datasets with called genotypes.
Does fastmixture outperform pcangsd, for example in the case we converted to a PLINK output and how the programs perform admixture analysis on the same input dataset?
Thanks for your thoughts!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If you have called genotypes, then I would definitely use fastmixture! The --admix option in pcangsd will be less accurate, and potentially not even faster even though it is based on a least-square approach. We showed in the fastmixture paper that least-square approaches are far less accurate than likelihood-based approaches.
You could try both options and see if they do not converge to the same solution. :-)
Hi Jonas,
I'm wondering about the similarities/differences and pros/cons of using pcangsd --admix vs. fastmixture for assignment/admixture/STRUCTURE analyses on datasets with called genotypes.
Does fastmixture outperform pcangsd, for example in the case we converted to a PLINK output and how the programs perform admixture analysis on the same input dataset?
Thanks for your thoughts!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: