You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
behresp currently simulates income changes on the intensive margin only,* i.e. changing the hours worked or wage to vary income conditional on employment.
Could it also model the extensive margin, i.e. decisions to enter or exit the labor force?
Chetty et al (2011) includes a meta-analysis of micro evidence estimating that steady-state substitution elasticities are roughly split between intensive and extensive. The extensive margin is particularly important for women.
Exit would be simpler to model than entry, since the latter involves imputing a new income level for people currently. This could be done by modeling the conditional distribution of people with income, or alternatively by shuffling weights between filing units with income vs. those without.
* The response function documentation cites two papers: Gruber and Saez (2002) does not mention intensive/extensive margins, and a scan of Feldstein and Feenberg (1995) discusses participation but I'm not sure if it models it specifically.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@MaxGhenis, thanks for raising this discussion of the extensive margin.
I would be pleased to review a PR that adds enhances Behavioral-Responses to estimate extensive margin effects. I'm adding a help wanted label here for now.
behresp currently simulates income changes on the intensive margin only,* i.e. changing the hours worked or wage to vary income conditional on employment.
Could it also model the extensive margin, i.e. decisions to enter or exit the labor force?
Chetty et al (2011) includes a meta-analysis of micro evidence estimating that steady-state substitution elasticities are roughly split between intensive and extensive. The extensive margin is particularly important for women.
Exit would be simpler to model than entry, since the latter involves imputing a new income level for people currently. This could be done by modeling the conditional distribution of people with income, or alternatively by shuffling weights between filing units with income vs. those without.
* The
response
function documentation cites two papers: Gruber and Saez (2002) does not mention intensive/extensive margins, and a scan of Feldstein and Feenberg (1995) discusses participation but I'm not sure if it models it specifically.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: