You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Figure 1: (a) surface albedo, (b) Dust Forcing efficiency (DirectRadiative forcing/od550dust) calculated as difference between 2x-dust and control. From AerChemMIP
Figure 2: as the figure 1 above just for LW forcing effciency
Note: I have selected a box transect from North Atlantic over North Africa. All the plots I am showing is for the same region.
The CMIP6 version of NorESM2-LM has the dry deposition bug which caused even more rapid settling of the large particles.
When running the dust radiative forcing experiments (DURF), i did histSST simulations using the FORCES NorESM2 version with this bug corrected. The bug did not make a substantial difference in the LW forcing efficiency, see my figure below.
Figure 3: Forcing efficiency for LW, SW and net for NorESM2 only, with dry deposition bug fix
I would like to tackle this issue in my upcomming PPE, so I was wondering which parameter in the models that would be best to adjust?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Figure 1: (a) surface albedo, (b) Dust Forcing efficiency (DirectRadiative forcing/od550dust) calculated as difference between 2x-dust and control. From AerChemMIP
Figure 2: as the figure 1 above just for LW forcing effciency
Note: I have selected a box transect from North Atlantic over North Africa. All the plots I am showing is for the same region.
The CMIP6 version of NorESM2-LM has the dry deposition bug which caused even more rapid settling of the large particles.
When running the dust radiative forcing experiments (DURF), i did histSST simulations using the FORCES NorESM2 version with this bug corrected. The bug did not make a substantial difference in the LW forcing efficiency, see my figure below.
Figure 3: Forcing efficiency for LW, SW and net for NorESM2 only, with dry deposition bug fix
I would like to tackle this issue in my upcomming PPE, so I was wondering which parameter in the models that would be best to adjust?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions