Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OpenCV read() vs jetcam read() method? #16

Open
SaddamBInSyed opened this issue Jan 6, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

OpenCV read() vs jetcam read() method? #16

SaddamBInSyed opened this issue Jan 6, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@SaddamBInSyed
Copy link

HI all,

I am already using OpenCV for the other image processing purpose in my code.

so I would like to ask WHY I need to use Jetcam camera methods to read the camera frame instead of the OpenCV read method?

why we need to introduce a new one here.

Is Jetcam read method faster and reliable than OpenCV camera read() methods?

please advise.

@jaybdub
Copy link
Contributor

jaybdub commented Mar 15, 2020

Hi SaddamBinSyed,

Thanks for reaching out!

If you're familiar with how to use OpenCV / GStreamer, that will be sufficient. Currently, JetCam is providing a simple abstraction for using OpenCV with accelerated GStreamer pipelines. This is possible using just OpenCV.

We used a specific pattern frequently in projects (ie: JetBot / JetRacer), so wanted to make the abstraction.

It is possible, that other methods for acquiring images would be used, but would share the same abstraction layer.

For now if you're happy using OpenCV, feel free. If we release any updates that differ in functionality from what OpenCV offers, I will try to update here.

Please let me know if you have any questions or feedback.

Best,
John

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants