You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardexpand all lines: _episodes/2.3.1_research_question.md
+25-28
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -27,60 +27,57 @@ Here are a few papers that caught our eye, maybe they inspire you (feel free to
27
27
-[High viral abundance and low diversity are associated with increased CRISPR-Cas prevalence across microbial ecosystems](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982221014615), by Meaden *et al* (2022)
28
28
-[Viruses interact with hosts that span distantly related microbial domains in dense hydrothermal mats](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-023-01347-5), by Hwang *et al* (2023)
29
29
30
-
# Choose one type of project
30
+
# Choose a type of project
31
31
32
-
Choose one type of project that better fits your interests:
32
+
To start, choose one type of project that better fits your interests:
33
33
34
34
-1. Go into detail into analyses
35
35
-2. Build a broader research proposal
36
36
37
-
1. In this type of project, you should be more hands-on. Write your own script(s), run your own analysis, produce your own plots, etc. The focus is on the method rather than on the biological questions. In any case, whatever you want to achieve should be clear and straightforward. An example: "What are the differences between functional annotation done with Pharokka and Genomad?". Here are our expactations from you if you choose this type of project:
37
+
## Detailed analyses
38
38
39
+
In this type of project, you should be more hands-on. Write your own script(s), run your own analysis, produce your own plots, etc. The focus is on the method rather than on the biological questions. In any case, whatever you want to achieve should be clear and straightforward. An example: "What are the differences between functional annotation done with Pharokka and Genomad?".
40
+
41
+
The following points should be clear in your final presentation and in your lab book:
42
+
43
+
- What you want to achieve
39
44
- Steps to take (consider drawing a workflow)
40
45
- Why you take these steps
41
-
-which data to use
42
-
- Which programs will/do you use?
46
+
-Which data to use
47
+
- Which programs will/do you use
43
48
44
-
2. In this type of project, you should focus on the biological questions and design it as if you were writing a research proposal. Your hypothesis and aims should be clear and backed-up by the literature. Here are our expactations from you if you choose this type of project:
49
+
Note that hypotheses do not need be proven. We want to see from you as results:
45
50
46
-
- what is the question
47
-
- what informed the question
48
-
- is it testable? and how
49
-
- Complexity of the problem
51
+
- Output (a table or a figure)
52
+
- Interpretation of the output: what does the data tell you?
53
+
- Does it answer your question? It does not have to. In a negative case, can you say what you might do differently next time
50
54
55
+
## Research proposal
51
56
52
-
Results:
57
+
In this type of project, you should focus on the biological questions and design it as if you were writing a research proposal. Your hypothesis and aims should be clear and backed-up by the literature.
53
58
54
-
- expected results
55
-
- Hypotheses don't need be proven - can be null hypothesis
56
-
- If you choose to do the detailed analyses:
57
-
- Generate an output (a table or a figure)
58
-
- Interpretation of the output: what does the data tell you?
59
-
- Does it answer your question? (It doesn't have to, you can say what you might do differently next time)
59
+
The following points should be clear in your final presentation and in your lab book:
60
60
61
-
Presentation
61
+
- What is the question
62
+
- What is the state of the art (backed up by the literature)
63
+
- What informed the question (cite your sources)
64
+
- Is it testable? How?
62
65
63
-
- comprehensive
64
-
- has to connect back to hypothesis
66
+
# Presentation
65
67
66
-
# Exercise
68
+
Document your project in your lab book and final presentation in a comprehensive way. Make sure your methods and results connect back to your hypothesis/what you wanted to achieve.
67
69
70
+
# Exercise
68
71
69
72
> ## Exercise
70
73
> 1. Once you have an idea of a research question, take some time to talk about your idea with your fellow students.
71
74
> Often your initial idea can be further refined based on discussions with others.
72
75
> 2. Make sure you check the literature: are there any papers that do something related to your question?
73
-
> Find the three papers that are the most closely related to your project, and use them to refine your question.
76
+
> For research proposal: find the three papers that are the most closely related to your project, and use them to refine your question.
74
77
> 3. Make a plan for tackling your question(s).
75
78
> The more detail you can add, the better.
76
79
> Think about data sources, bioinformatic methods, possible outcomes, expectations, backup/follow-up plans, hypotheses, and interpretation.
77
80
> {: .source}
78
81
{: .challenge}
79
82
80
83
Here, you can find [ideas for projects](https://mgxlab.github.io/Viromics2024/ideas_projects/index.html).
0 commit comments