You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, beamformers are a sub-class of microphone array objects. Ideally, the beamformers should have a structure more similar to the DOA or adaptive filters objects. They could be a subclass of STFT processing too.
It would be good that all the beamforming algorithms are also defined as sub-classes of a parent abstract class. This way, new algorithms could be easily added.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@fakufaku I am interested in this enhancement, because I am thinking about doing some experiments with MVDR, for example. As soon as I start working on it I can share here if I can do this separation, if you still think it would be interesting.
Currently, beamformers are a sub-class of microphone array objects. Ideally, the beamformers should have a structure more similar to the DOA or adaptive filters objects. They could be a subclass of STFT processing too.
It would be good that all the beamforming algorithms are also defined as sub-classes of a parent abstract class. This way, new algorithms could be easily added.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: