You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One of the advantages of lasy is it's ability to separately define the longitudinal and transverse profiles of the laser pulse and then combine them together. Currently, the subsequent manipulation of the pulse (eg. adding an optic, propagating etc.) requires the full laser object, which is often a 2-3D array.
It would be highly beneficial if we could add some of these features into the transverse and longitudinal profiles of the laser or for example choose to take a full laser object but only manipulate the transverse profile or only manipulate the longitudinal profile without carrying around the baggage of the rest of the grid, slowing down computations.
Not entirely sure yet what the best way to approach this would be, but perhaps warrants a discussion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One of the advantages of
lasy
is it's ability to separately define the longitudinal and transverse profiles of the laser pulse and then combine them together. Currently, the subsequent manipulation of the pulse (eg. adding an optic, propagating etc.) requires the full laser object, which is often a 2-3D array.It would be highly beneficial if we could add some of these features into the transverse and longitudinal profiles of the laser or for example choose to take a full laser object but only manipulate the transverse profile or only manipulate the longitudinal profile without carrying around the baggage of the rest of the grid, slowing down computations.
Not entirely sure yet what the best way to approach this would be, but perhaps warrants a discussion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: