You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
like every benchmark set I considered incorporates function recursion: tamandu, lambda^2, myth.
I fear if I wanna be able to use their benchmark tasks as-is, I'll need to augment my grammar to account for this, i.e. go from an expression of combinators to a (recursive) function definition (add Match, FunBind as per grammar), which also requires variables (#8) due to the function parameters.
I'm kind of unhappy about this though, as you may need types to work with recursion.
while that may not so much be an issue in synthesis, where you may know the target type signature, this feels tougher in task function generation for my training set, where I'm currently just generating any seemingly sensible function without regard to types.
maybe it'd just work -- I should try.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
like every benchmark set I considered incorporates function recursion:
tamandu
,lambda^2
,myth
.I fear if I wanna be able to use their benchmark tasks as-is, I'll need to augment my grammar to account for this, i.e. go from an expression of combinators to a (recursive) function definition (add
Match
,FunBind
as per grammar), which also requires variables (#8) due to the function parameters.I'm kind of unhappy about this though, as you may need types to work with recursion.
while that may not so much be an issue in synthesis, where you may know the target type signature, this feels tougher in task function generation for my training set, where I'm currently just generating any seemingly sensible function without regard to types.
maybe it'd just work -- I should try.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: