Replies: 3 comments
-
Please note, that not all Spyservers are online 24/7. In the past (2-3 years ago) I could find one (with sampling rate of 2.000 MS instead of 2.048 MS, and I had to convert it), it worked in (very old) Qt-DAB. So, the answer is yes, it works. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
the spyserver handlers understand that not everyone delivers samples with
the correct rate. Theu are able to do some conversion (the "old" airspy's,
i.e. mine, deliver samples with a rate of 2500000, the newer ones with
3000000
The spyserver handlers do understand that
Op vr 7 feb 2025 om 16:35 schreef andimik ***@***.***>:
… Please note, that not all Spyservers are online 24/7.
In the past (2-3 years ago) I could find one (with sampling rate of 2.000
MS instead of 2.048 MS, and I had to convert it), it worked in (very old)
Qt-DAB.
So, the answer is yes, it works.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#351 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACCPHQB2XU3FNYDJFCPPJUT2OTHFHAVCNFSM6AAAAABWVXGJY2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTEMBZGU3TCMA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
--
Jan van Katwijk
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
But the spyserver code does not compile on MinGW. Simple stuff like: qt-devices/spy-server-8/tcp-client-8.cpp(85,5): error: use of undeclared identifier 'close'; did you mean 'fclose'?
85 | close (SendingSocket);
| ^~~~~ So I suspect it will abort at runtime. Easily fixed by: #define close(s) ::closesocket(s) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I note that the latest version supports Spyserver. But playing with it, I fail
to find any Spyserver that could receive on such VHF/UHF frequencies.
Anyone know one I could test with?
Besides, in my experience with Spyservers on HF, they have a rather limited samplerate. So are such servers really suited for DAB?
(where 1.5 MB/s is needed, no?)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions