Skip to content

tangent_type(primal_type) #634

Open
Open
@oxinabox

Description

@oxinabox

Our life would be easier if we had a single canonical tangent type for any given primal type.
Wouldn't need to worry about having both natural and structural tangents needing to be supported.
Could require that a mapping (possibly via convert) from various forms to the single specified type was given.

Potentially this could be done in a nonbreaking way if it was required to use it, just preferred

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Structural TangentRelated to the `Tangent` type for structured (composite) valuesbreakinga breaking changespeculativefairly out there ideas for consideration in longer term

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions