-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fuselage cannot have z offset in front of the wing/fuselage junction (towards the nose) #312
Comments
Only just looking at this now after we spoke before Christmas. I was having issues with the trim solver which I didn't get around to addressing, where the derivatives seem to be zero when they should be - do these issues also occur for dynamic cases? |
by derivatives you mean the gradients for the trim inputs from the Newton loop? |
Yes I do - the incorrect gradient caused some of the states for the next iteration to be something unreasonable which caused the structural solver to not converge. Might be a different issue |
hmmm incorrect as in diff in output/diff in input is incorrect or the result of input+output/gradient is too far away from the solution point? Assuming the former, changing the relaxation factor does help (some sort of a "step size" parameter), but only if you fix this bug
|
Describe the bug
as described - structural solver nonconvergence observed
To Reproduce
branch dev_fuselage_bug - simple_HALE/generate_hale_nose.py vs simple_HALE/generate_hale_nose_dip.py
Expected behaviour
convergence and time-stepping until completion
Screenshots
|==========|==========|==========|==========|==========|==========|==========|==========|==========|==========|
| iter |alpha[deg]|elev[deg] | thrust | Fx | Fy | Fz | Mx | My | Mz |
|==========|==========|==========|==========|==========|==========|==========|==========|==========|==========|
Residual is: 3.3313240830999096E-006
STOP Static equations did not converge (17235)
System Info (please complete the following information):
Additional context
prime suspect - CRV in this particular direction? Will do a bit more digging later - just starting this to keep it logged
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: