-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 689
[hxb] Add minor version handling, increase current version #12365
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
kLabz
wants to merge
6
commits into
development
Choose a base branch
from
hxb_version_2.1
base: development
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+42
−20
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6e39722
Warnings
kLabz 6fe3e8d
[hxb] introduce minor version, bump to hxb version 2.1
kLabz 64a0a82
[hxb] Fix mismatch between preview1 / pre #12351 nightlies and post #…
kLabz 3e2457b
[hxb] handle hxb version for server cache too
kLabz 1968921
[hxb] display older versions as "1.0", not "2.0"
kLabz 2919a71
Be more specific in the comment
kLabz File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,5 +1,3 @@ | ||
| open Atomic | ||
|
|
||
| type 'a t = { | ||
| mutable value: 'a option; | ||
| mutex: Mutex.t; | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ open Type | |
| open Error | ||
| open Gctx | ||
| open Hlcode | ||
| open Semver | ||
|
|
||
| (* compiler *) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't this start at 0?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The hack for retro compatibility with preview1 is to consider preview1 to be
2.0(instead of1.0) so that we're back to comparing minor versionsSo here we'd start with 2.1 for the 12351 change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But why do we check the minor version in the first place?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To know when some data should (or not) be read, like https://github.com/HaxeFoundation/haxe/pull/12365/files#diff-e11692c26a1b5eb50b0ff3c69d1faa85d755afd3eb2e2daba537d844d8eddb21R1587-R1591 for 12351
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes but then why not check
hxb_major >= 2for this one?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would work (well it wouldn't with current impl) too, but for the next changes we'll always want to check minor versions, never major (if the major version didn't match we wouldn't be in hxb reader in the first place).
I figured I'd use that same behavior from the beginning
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I kind of get what you're saying, but this is completely internal and invisible. I'd find it more natural to go from version 1.0 (implied) to 2.0 instead of 2.1, and that's actually visible.