Category leads to review pending issues and PRs

[holanita]

Hi @aoifefitton @markus-ntt-seidl @navveenb (cc @greenhsu123)

As discussed in today's meeting, we have 20 issues and 20 PRs which haven't been turned into live patterns yet. Before we close this year, please review the ones that belong to your categories. The goal would be to find out whether there are any issues or PRs that we could turn into live patterns before the holidays. Let's discuss in our next call! In case you can't join us next time, please comment on this ticket. Thanks!

[holanita]

For some reason, I can't assign all of you. Will try again later.

[markus-gsf-seidl]

As a web lead:

• Compress stored data #188 :See my last comment

As a PR writer:

Done:

• Enable text compression #90 : Technical Writer Review
• Keep request counts low #125 : Technical Writer Review
• Optimize impact on customer devices and equipment #56 #139 : Adjusted with latest SME feedback, would be done in my opinion
• Eliminate creation and maintenance of unused assets #68 #141 : Adjusted with latest SME feedback, would be done in my opinion
• Minimize main thread work #55 #143 : Adjusted with latest SME feedback, would be done in my opinion
• Use serverless cloud services for running workloads #129 #151 : Adjusted with latest SME feedback, would be done in my opinion
• Using Complied Languages rather than Interpreted Languages #132 #152 : Adjusted with latest SME feedback, would be done in my opinion

Second SME Feedback needed to help bring these into the main branch. Maybe someone can take over Sarah's feedback and provide a second point of view:

• Choose sustainable region for workloads  #128
• Optimize code that consume most resources #137
• Optimize data access patterns #138

[aoifefitton]

Initial review completed on and SME review assigned to PRs: #140 #147 #153 #154 #155 #157 #159 Would appreciate second opinion on: #148 #151 #152 Thanks, Aoife

…

On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 3:04 PM Markus Seidl ***@***.***> wrote: As a web lead: - #188 <#188> :See my last comment As a PR writer: Done: - #90 <#90> : Technical Writer Review - #125 <#125> : Technical Writer Review - #139 <#139> : Adjusted with latest SME feedback, would be done in my opinion - #141 <#141> : Adjusted with latest SME feedback, would be done in my opinion - #143 <#143> : Adjusted with latest SME feedback, would be done in my opinion - #129 <#129> : Adjusted with latest SME feedback, would be done in my opinion - #152 <#152> : Adjusted with latest SME feedback, would be done in my opinion Second SME Feedback needed to help bring these into the main branch. Maybe someone can take over Sarah's feedback and provide a second point of view: - #128 <#128> - #137 <#137> - #138 <#138> — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#199 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APZ5SED54UEWNGEK3M247D3WMNDAFANCNFSM6AAAAAASVVBD4Y> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: <Green-Software-Foundation/green-software-patterns/issues/199/1344415385@ github.com>