Repository navigation
Replies: 1 comment
|
Hi, so right now i dont have plans to support the new version as i've actually been considering moving away from the Jumanji API. As far as i know the only difference is the spec types so it shouldn't be hard to change any of the existing algorithms to use it as all that needs to be done is remove the func brackets (). |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hello,
I'm working on a custom simulator that extends one of the environments in Jumanji.
Our current version of the environment follows the environment signature of Jumanji v1.1.0. However, while trying to use Stoix, we encountered a version mismatch issue. This is mainly due to differences in the signature of the
Environmentclass in Jumanji. In the new version, instead of using functions to define the action and observation spaces, Jumanji now uses@cached_property, making these specifications attributes rather than functions.Therefore, I would like to ask whether support for the new version of Jumanji (v1.1.0) is planned.
Thanks in advance, and congratulations on the library!
All reactions