-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reasonable wercker config #82
Comments
smaller is better, I'd also prefer only master |
Ok. Should we use one Python version in wercker box or try to run tests for multiple? I'm investigating how we could the latter. There are some options:
And... maybe the most important question - what kind of tests, or what at all could we run on wercker? It's really quick - comparing to travis. |
I think we could create our own docker file and use it with wercker. |
First of all I would like to use workflows. If some stage fails, then it doesn't make to move further.
Can it be done in wercker ? |
I'll try to make something like Proof of Concept based on steps above. |
If you don't mind - I'll test it on my repo fork, because it will be probably a lot of trash. |
Sure |
@grzanka I have another minor decision to make:
It looks like repo-installed numpy is being replaced when installing beprof with pip. So the whole "Testing repo installed numpy" is pointless in this case. I'll for now use Edit: more can be found here https://app.wercker.com/ant6/beprof/runs/test_opensuse_leap_repo/58440ba485198d010082fa9e?step=58440bb3c6f72d000173cd79 |
Checklist here: #105 |
Prepare more reasonable wercker config and add finally badge to README.rst
To be discussed here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: