SWL and runup #4
davefavismortlock
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
|
Run-up is obtaining from empirical formulas and written into an output file. It would be useful if we will compute the flooding coastline due to all (surge, setup, mean, astronomical, run-up, ...) components. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
|
I agree on this - the origin of the Dean profile should not be based on calculated runup |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
OK all: so CoastalME now uses mean SWL to determine the start elevation of beach Dean profiles. The question is: should we also use runup?
Manuel said "Regarding the problem with the wave run-up, I am in complete agreement with you [@dave Favis-Mortlock] on leaving it as it is. From my point of view, the wave run-up is a process of water ascent along the beach profile, which can locally increase the flood elevation (in time and space) but does not significantly modify the profile shape, so I would not consider it. Additionally, the Dean profile should establish a “hypothetical equilibrium state to which the beach tends”, something medium to long-term, not short-term like the wave run-up. CShore calculates it based on empirical formulas, so I prepared the CoastalME code to calculate it using different empirical formulas without needing to extract it from CShore."
So we don't consider runup for beach Dean profiles, I guess. Comments, anyone?
Manuel, where in CoastalME do we use runup now? Where would we like to use it in future? Please excuse me if these are stupid questions :-)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions