Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Suggestion: simplify API by using AsyncHandler[Id] instead of overloads for blocking methods #2

Open
iravid opened this issue Mar 10, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Suggestion: simplify API by using AsyncHandler[Id] instead of overloads for blocking methods #2

iravid opened this issue Mar 10, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@iravid
Copy link

iravid commented Mar 10, 2018

Instead of having overloads for the blocking methods on Consumer, an AsyncHandler[Id] can be provided instead with a separate import.
@sksamuel
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, I will do this for the 2.0.0 release I am working on. Good idea.

@sksamuel sksamuel added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 26, 2018
gmethvin added a commit to gmethvin/pulsar4s that referenced this issue Apr 12, 2019
@gmethvin
Improved API for negative acknowledgements (CleverCloud#2)
bfa21f4
@Anonymitaet Anonymitaet mentioned this issue Jan 11, 2021
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@iravid @sksamuel