- Date: 2026-02-12
- Git Hash:
fd5b2273ad7f51e50a5432a1154c757561650753 - Command:
sbatch jobfile.slurm - Logs Prefix:
monaco/logs/frollino
Implemented the lookup of the last hash prefix to avoid comparisons in the rehashes, plus some small random tweaks
dataset,exact,approx
census,74.48,11.63
ht,638.34,555.61
pamap2,,
chem,,
fashion,6.14,4.54
nytimes,22.19,14.33
glove,321.78,97.14
sift,93.32,35.29
gist,,
simplewiki,83.02,26.93
landmark,260.61,53.42
imagenet,238.27,70.62Great results, assertion fails on some datasets
- Date: 2026-02-12
- Git Hash:
d79309db26925ed8e7aa6eadf057e8bea54ed02c - Command:
sbatch jobfile.slurm - Logs Prefix:
monaco/logs/spring
Implemented the lookup of the last hash prefix to avoid comparisons in the rehashes, plus some small random tweaks
dataset,exact,approx
census,344.30,119.68
ht,589.74,587.32
pamap2,3103.90,1723.80
chem,,
fashion,41.23,6.17
nytimes,1809.88,106.79
glove,11481.90,7344.73
sift,1443.00,1001.30
gist,,
simplewiki,16654.59,1001.30
landmark,3061.66,464.62
imagenet,1443.00,162.48It's finally working on all datasets, but it's kinda slow
- Date: 2026-01-30
- Git Hash:
66f47413d136228bbbc1d6d173c864f8c1e32d91 - Command:
sbatch jobfile.slurm - Logs Prefix:
monaco/logs/cefixima
Bisect to see where the performance degradation started
dataset,exact,approx
census,25.14,26.22
ht,NOT CONNECTED,
pamap2,371.82,365.28
chem,,
fashion,15.26,8.25
nytimes,1758.25,118.59
glove,,
sift,2323.33,142.49
gist,,
simplewiki,,
landmark,,
imagenet,,[still running]
- Date: 2026-01-29
- Git Hash:
7bbcd6ee171154af87b1bcf13a9659183892d750 - Command:
sbatch jobfile.slurm - Logs Prefix:
monaco/logs/azitromicina
Bisect to see where the performance degradation started
dataset,exact,approx
census,,
ht,,
pamap2,,
chem,,
fashion,32.93,5.78
nytimes,1709.60,370.79
glove,TIMEOUT,
sift,5126.96,165.68
gist,,
simplewiki,15747.65,1221.39
landmark,,
imagenet,,Bad version again
- Date: 2026-01-28
- Git Hash:
66bae24a855027aa0159ce7e08d2979b31f1ba13 - Command:
sbatch jobfile.slurm - Logs Prefix:
monaco/logs/amoxicillina
See what happends if we reduce the number of repetitions from 1000 to 500 on the current version of the code
dataset,exact,approx
census,,
ht,,
pamap2,,
chem,,
fashion,221.79,7.66
nytimes,4293.34,312.10
glove,,
sift,,
gist,,
simplewiki,,
landmark,,
imagenet,,Yes we do, the rehashes are too costly [still running]
- Date: 2026-01-28
- Git Hash:
66bae24a855027aa0159ce7e08d2979b31f1ba13 - Command:
sbatch jobfile.slurm - Logs Prefix:
monaco/logs/balenot
Check the point of the current version of the code
dataset,exact,approx
census,1137.41,218.95
ht,5704.30,2789.55
pamap2,,
chem,,
fashion,31.59,9.21
nytimes,2794.01,164.72
glove,FAILED,
sift,1861.01,245.68
gist,FAILED,
simplewiki,13615.06,996.67
landmark,4368.69,153.68
imagenet,,Fails on gist, glove
- Date: 2026-01-27
- Git Hash:
4b5da83e6bc53151d43c106efa62065179bbae7c - Command:
sbatch jobfile.slurm - Logs Prefix:
monaco/logs/baleno
Can we use a Bloom filter to avoid the comparison of pairs we already seen in other rehashes?
dataset,exact,approx
census,388.86,86.22
ht,,
pamap2,,
chem,,
fashion,28.69,4.16
nytimes,,
glove,,
sift,,
gist,,
simplewiki,,
landmark,7370.41,159.12
imagenet,,I guess not!
- Date: YYYY-MM-DD
- Git Hash:
[hash] - Command:
sbatch jobfile.slurm - Logs Prefix:
[name]
[Description of why this experiment is being conducted]
dataset,exact,approx
census,,
ht,,
pamap2,,
chem,,
fashion,,
nytimes,,
glove,,
sift,,
gist,,
simplewiki,,
landmark,,
imagenet,,[Sintesi dei risultati e conclusioni]