-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Route wildcard naming #68
Comments
Hi, thanks for your issue. Yes, unfortunately now this project support only Thanks a lot. |
I understand completely. If I manage to conjure up some time myself, I'll implement the solution and send a PR. Thank you for your comitment :) |
Hi, thanks for all your effort! |
Hi @dgustala, in this case |
Good to know. Thanks! |
First off; Thank you for developing this fine project! :)
However, we had quite some trouble getting the library to work for us.
Thing was that in Ocelot the route wildcards can be named whatever. In our case they were named {path} and Ocelot-wise that was all working fine. However after some debugging we found that SwaggerForOcelot does not allow this, and will only accept wildcards named {everything}.
My suggestion would be to either implement a fix that allows any wildcard naming, like Ocelot do, or to expressively state in the documentation that only the {everything} wildcard tag is supported.
It might help others 👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: