Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ARM: Update all LRO templates to prefer Azure-AsyncOperation and add linting rule to check #2383

Open
markcowl opened this issue Mar 13, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
breaking-change A change that might cause specs or code to break design:needed A design request has been raised that needs a proposal lib:azure-resource-manager Issues for @azure-tools/typespec-azure-core library needs-area
Milestone

Comments

@markcowl
Copy link
Member

markcowl commented Mar 13, 2025

  • Add a linting rule to require Azure-AsyncOperation as the primary mechanism for resolving LROs
  • Update spec templates to choose this by default
  • Update existing specs to avoid swagger changes in existing APIs
@markcowl markcowl changed the title Update all LRO templates to prefer Azure-AsyncOperation and add linting rule to check ARM: Update all LRO templates to prefer Azure-AsyncOperation and add linting rule to check Mar 13, 2025
@markcowl markcowl added lib:azure-resource-manager Issues for @azure-tools/typespec-azure-core library breaking-change A change that might cause specs or code to break labels Mar 13, 2025
@markcowl markcowl added feature New feature or request needs-area design:needed A design request has been raised that needs a proposal and removed feature New feature or request labels Mar 13, 2025
@markcowl markcowl added this to the [2025] May milestone Mar 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking-change A change that might cause specs or code to break design:needed A design request has been raised that needs a proposal lib:azure-resource-manager Issues for @azure-tools/typespec-azure-core library needs-area
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant