Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The fine-tuned results are worse than the original results #76

Open
wuhongsheng opened this issue Jul 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

The fine-tuned results are worse than the original results #76

wuhongsheng opened this issue Jul 24, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@wuhongsheng
Copy link

wuhongsheng commented Jul 24, 2023 •
edited
Loading

phasenet_origin_1
phasenet_pick_1
@wuhongsheng wuhongsheng changed the title After I use my own data fine-tuning, the output is 0 The fine-tuned results are worse than the original results Jul 24, 2023
@SyahrulApr86
Copy link

I came across your issue regarding fine-tuning results being worse than the original. I'm currently working on a similar problem and would love to understand more about your approach and the code you used for fine-tuning.

Would it be possible for you to share details on your methodology and code implementation? It would be really helpful in understanding the challenges and potential improvements.

Looking forward to your response. Thanks in advance!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@wuhongsheng @SyahrulApr86