You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 16, 2019. It is now read-only.
Would the government require the name of the researcher if the vendor provides protection for the researchers and considers this information confidential and provides confidentiality assurances for researchers?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In accordance with RFQ Section 12.0 Addendum - Commercial Contract Clauses, FAR Clauses 52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certifications -- Commercial Items (Jan 2017), the government will require assurances that the researchers who received the payouts are not from countries forbidden to receive payouts from the government. If a researcher's handle and some other information would be capable of providing the government with these assurances, please outline how and it will be considered.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Question/Comment on TTS Bug Bounty RFQ
Name and affiliation
Brett Kozisek
Director
Synack Inc.
Section of RFQ documents
RFQ Section 3.0 - Requirements on disclosure of researchers- https://github.com/18F/tts-buy-bug-bounty/blob/master/2018-procurement/RFQ.md#30-requirements
Within Bounty Pool Management under sub bullet four it states - “Forward to TTS the vulnerability reports, the names of the researchers, and the award amounts.”
Question/Comment
Would the government require the name of the researcher if the vendor provides protection for the researchers and considers this information confidential and provides confidentiality assurances for researchers?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: